And nary a Star Trek flick among them. I wonder if they didn't want to embarrass the franchise with having had every bit of bad science in the chart, or if they were simply assuming that we already knew that was the case.
Also, I'm willing to give 2001 a pass on the moving slowly in vacuum, because IIRC that was done deliberately as a visual cue, so it's stylized rather than merely bad science. (Kubrick set that style rather than following it.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2010-12-29 03:03 pm (UTC)Also, I'm willing to give 2001 a pass on the moving slowly in vacuum, because IIRC that was done deliberately as a visual cue, so it's stylized rather than merely bad science. (Kubrick set that style rather than following it.)